Author Topic: Faeit 212 and BoLS and GW (maybe?)  (Read 6748 times)

the_trooper

  • God
  • *****
  • Posts: 2549
  • Pay where you play.
    • Email
Re: Faeit 212 and BoLS and GW (maybe?)
« Reply #15 on: April 30, 2013, 12:57:27 PM »
Let's not generalize then.

GW has shown behavior in the past and recently that are clearly in line with definition of bullying.

Quote from: Google definition
bullying  present participle of bul·ly
Verb
Use superior strength or influence to intimidate (someone), typically to force him or her to do what one wants.

DMCA requests, while sometimes valid, can be used to push around smaller companies.

steelforge

  • Heroic Tier Level 2
  • **
  • Posts: 97
Re: Faeit 212 and BoLS and GW (maybe?)
« Reply #16 on: April 30, 2013, 01:07:12 PM »
Anyone know who MM3791 actually is?

Also, thanks GW, I just kickstarted Deadzone and Robotech!

Logan007

  • Epic Tier Level 22
  • ****
  • Posts: 767
Re: Faeit 212 and BoLS and GW (maybe?)
« Reply #17 on: April 30, 2013, 01:09:27 PM »
Yeah, I'm spending all my money on warmachine and not 40k because of all these shenanigans.

MM3791

  • God
  • *****
  • Posts: 1124
Re: Faeit 212 and BoLS and GW (maybe?)
« Reply #18 on: April 30, 2013, 01:11:43 PM »
I'm not sure if that defination of "bullying" is in context with "piracy"

Sir_Prometheus

  • God
  • *****
  • Posts: 1573
    • Email
Re: Faeit 212 and BoLS and GW (maybe?)
« Reply #19 on: April 30, 2013, 01:35:22 PM »
Warseer is kinda douchey. 

One of the problems here is that the law still probably isn't on GW's side, but it's kinda hard to protest it.  There's still a "fair use" exemption generally, but moreover, that fair use case is stronger because it's a leak.  It's "news" then.  Big papers and news channels show that kinda stuff all the time, a rumors blog is no different.  GW would have a much stronger case after the magazine came out. 

the_trooper

  • God
  • *****
  • Posts: 2549
  • Pay where you play.
    • Email
Re: Faeit 212 and BoLS and GW (maybe?)
« Reply #20 on: April 30, 2013, 01:41:16 PM »
I'm not sure if that defination of "bullying" is in context with "piracy"

It's not. The logic chain to follow is that GW is using DMCA to break smaller groups. Hence GW being a bully.

Also, I believe Sir_Prometheus is on to something as GW's claims may not actually be founded in reality.

Now just so we are all on the same page, the reason people have such concerns about DMCA is that it's a threat of a threat of legal action. You don't actually need to see a copyright violation to send a DMCA takedown request.

EDIT:
http://fairuse.stanford.edu/Copyright_and_Fair_Use_Overview/chapter9/9-c.html
Here is some examples of fair use. It has some portions relating to why news usage of copyrighted material is fair use and not piracy.
« Last Edit: April 30, 2013, 01:45:10 PM by the_trooper »

Sir_Prometheus

  • God
  • *****
  • Posts: 1573
    • Email
Re: Faeit 212 and BoLS and GW (maybe?)
« Reply #21 on: April 30, 2013, 02:06:40 PM »
Intellectual property laws, generally, are just nutso at this stage.  It's gotten crazy enough, ironically, that I'm no longer all that worried about it, policy wise, as I kinda thing the whole structure is going to come crashing down, soon. 

But in the meantime, painful crap like this will occur. 

Honestly, both Faeit and Bols can just file a counter notice.  The real problem is this stuff can be used to take down whole sites (mostly cuz the hosts overeact) without any real justification. 

steelforge

  • Heroic Tier Level 2
  • **
  • Posts: 97
Re: Faeit 212 and BoLS and GW (maybe?)
« Reply #22 on: April 30, 2013, 02:15:07 PM »
MM3791 you work for GW do you not?

Chase

  • Global Moderator
  • God
  • *****
  • Posts: 5433
    • Email
Re: Faeit 212 and BoLS and GW (maybe?)
« Reply #23 on: April 30, 2013, 03:44:10 PM »
MM3791 is a long time BG customer / GW game player.  He shops and plays at both locations, occasionally,  and is an EXTREMELY nice guy.

He just tends to be way right of center.  ;)
"In the absence of orders, go find something and kill it."
- Field Marshal Erwin Rommel

MM3791

  • God
  • *****
  • Posts: 1124
Re: Faeit 212 and BoLS and GW (maybe?)
« Reply #24 on: April 30, 2013, 04:03:05 PM »
Anyone know who MM3791 actually is?

MM3791 you work for GW do you not?

<Insert gravely voice> "I'm the hero Gotham needs"

*Joking*

My name is Mike, I'm not at the store very often, but when I do go I'm oddly enough spending more time buying models then actually playing the game.. hopefully that will change soon and I'll get to play more in the coming weeks.

And no I don't work for GW, I wasn't looking for a debate, I was just trying to offer a logical analysis for both sides. If someone was dumping on Privateer Press I'd defend them too, even though I don't even play Hordes.. I just don't think the whole pitchfork & torch method of criticism is very productive.

MM3791 is a long time BG customer / GW game player.  He shops and plays at both locations, occasionally,  and is an EXTREMELY nice guy.

He just tends to be way right of center.  ;)

Thanks for the kind words Chase, I don't mind the criticism.. I have tough skin ;)

And then Luke blew up the Deathstar and Frodo threw the ring into the lava, and then everyone left the theater  8)

Sir_Prometheus

  • God
  • *****
  • Posts: 1573
    • Email
Re: Faeit 212 and BoLS and GW (maybe?)
« Reply #25 on: April 30, 2013, 04:34:56 PM »
Hey, I'm republican.  screw copyright (and patents, and most trademarks, too).  Shit's screwed up. 

Logan007

  • Epic Tier Level 22
  • ****
  • Posts: 767
Re: Faeit 212 and BoLS and GW (maybe?)
« Reply #26 on: April 30, 2013, 04:54:51 PM »
I'm against things that don't make sense -- like going after sites that are giving you free publicity.
« Last Edit: April 30, 2013, 05:22:43 PM by Logan007 »

PhoenixFire

  • Epic Tier Level 30
  • ****
  • Posts: 1049
Re: Faeit 212 and BoLS and GW (maybe?)
« Reply #27 on: April 30, 2013, 05:04:33 PM »
"Oh we do not speak it's name"

henceforth online i shall refer to them as "the games company that must not be named"

MM3791

  • God
  • *****
  • Posts: 1124
Re: Faeit 212 and BoLS and GW (maybe?)
« Reply #28 on: April 30, 2013, 05:23:23 PM »
Hey, I'm republican.  screw copyright (and patents, and most trademarks, too).  Shit's screwed up.

I laughed out loud so hard when I read this

I'm against things that don't make sense -- like going after sites that are giving your free publicity.

It's most likely because they don't want competitor's stealing ideas before the models actually hit shelves. I'm not a lawyer, but I read that anyone can legally copy GWs concepts and then turn around and sue GW for releasing their own model. In other words, if the model is only a picture and not yet released, then its fair game to copy.

Chase

  • Global Moderator
  • God
  • *****
  • Posts: 5433
    • Email
Re: Faeit 212 and BoLS and GW (maybe?)
« Reply #29 on: April 30, 2013, 05:30:06 PM »
It IS pretty horrible that I have to visit blog / rumor sites to have any idea what's coming up and what the models look like.  Otherwise I literally have to pay (by buying a White Dwarf) to see the new models and learn about them on time.
"In the absence of orders, go find something and kill it."
- Field Marshal Erwin Rommel