I think that is part of the problem..no way to enforce painting..so some people will just refuse to paint, and yes again I realize there are legit reason not to have a painted army...but it seems like a majority...would just like to see the community put a little pressure onto that part of the hobby for everyday play to attract more players...again, a fully painted star wars miniature game (not the pre-painted one) is what got me to look at miniature games.
First of all J0kerr, thank you for posting an actual view on the issue, you're doing much better than Jim. I obviously can't speak for everyone, but to me, seeing armies like those painted by Chris Scotti, or John Walsh, Bill Souza, any number of excellent painters and players, I think there
IS pressure to get one's models painted. That said, not everyone is interested in playing. It is but one of multiple parts of the hobby. I know people, for example, who don't play. Whether we like it or not, we have to be inclusive of everyone in the community, and of their way of enjoying the hobby, or eventually there will be no community. I agree that it would be good for armies to be painted, but I think that it's best for the group to realize that 40k is different things for different people.