Author Topic: Forgeworld at BG tournaments?  (Read 6773 times)

Benjamin

  • God
  • *****
  • Posts: 2610
    • Email
Re: Forgeworld at BG tournaments?
« Reply #30 on: March 01, 2013, 08:14:50 AM »
Yes there are, and its already happening, allow FW and see people who are not often seen in tournaments showing up more often.
How many people do you know of who are refusing to play?

Grimwulfe

  • God
  • *****
  • Posts: 1154
  • Dark Star Founding Member
    • Email
Re: Forgeworld at BG tournaments?
« Reply #31 on: March 01, 2013, 09:55:28 AM »
Alan that can also be true about the reverse.  Add in FW and see people who usually go to tournies not show up.  Its a double edged sword for sure and ill back up Chase however he decides to do it.
Dark Star Founding Member
NOVA 2011 Trios Team Champions
NOVA 2012 Trios Team Champions
WGC 2013 Doubles Best Sportman
NOVA 2013 Trios Team Champions
DaBoyz GT 2013 Best Theme 1st Place
Adepticon Champ 2014 Best Imperial Showing
Adepticon Team 2014 Best Imperial Showing

Achillius

  • Epic Tier Level 26
  • ****
  • Posts: 891
Re: Forgeworld at BG tournaments?
« Reply #32 on: March 01, 2013, 10:39:40 AM »
Alan that can also be true about the reverse.  Add in FW and see people who usually go to tournies not show up.  Its a double edged sword for sure and ill back up Chase however he decides to do it.

Oh I agree, if BG decides no, then it's no, I won't be thrilled but will respect it.
But the universe is a big place and, whatever happens, you will not be missed...

"When Ghandi advocated his philosophy of none violence, I bet he didn't know how much fun it was killing stuff!" (Raj, The big bang theory)

Achillius

  • Epic Tier Level 26
  • ****
  • Posts: 891
Re: Forgeworld at BG tournaments?
« Reply #33 on: March 01, 2013, 10:42:46 AM »
Yes there are, and its already happening, allow FW and see people who are not often seen in tournaments showing up more often.
How many people do you know of who are refusing to play?

Read back, Trooper has said he'd play in these things more,I can say the same for myself too, others, ill leave to speak for themselves if they frequent the boards.....
But the universe is a big place and, whatever happens, you will not be missed...

"When Ghandi advocated his philosophy of none violence, I bet he didn't know how much fun it was killing stuff!" (Raj, The big bang theory)

Sir_Prometheus

  • God
  • *****
  • Posts: 1573
    • Email
Re: Forgeworld at BG tournaments?
« Reply #34 on: March 01, 2013, 10:45:17 AM »
Alan that can also be true about the reverse. 

I dunno, the doubles tournament seemed to have all the competitive types show up, and it seemed a pretty full house.   Notably not a lot of FW actually showed up, though. 

the_trooper

  • God
  • *****
  • Posts: 2549
  • Pay where you play.
    • Email
Re: Forgeworld at BG tournaments?
« Reply #35 on: March 01, 2013, 11:17:30 AM »
My only concern is if players refuse to play in tournaments in which FW is not allowed. Will anyone flat-out refuse to play without FW?

Me.

I suppose it's a bit more complicated than just that but that is a big part of it.

keithb

  • Epic Tier Level 24
  • ****
  • Posts: 811
Re: Forgeworld at BG tournaments?
« Reply #36 on: March 01, 2013, 11:27:36 AM »
I like this thread.  It has offered some perspective.

It has been my plan, since Abington has the space to host events, to experiment more and more with FW.  You can expect to see the events there incorporate FW more and more.


One thing that I think should be discussed is the incentive that allowing FW offers a person to NOT start a new army either ever, or for an extended amount of time.  How much longer does the life of an army last when you're not only limited by mixing and matching codex units to form army lists, but also the FW options for your army?

I really, truly want people to love the army or armies they have.  I also want them to start new armies as often as possible.  I am not sure the widespread allowance of FW at our events helps this more than it hurts it, although based on what people here are saying it might be closer than I first thought.


If it's fair to assume people start new armies because they are bored or mostly "done" experimenting with their current choice (which may or may not be true), does allowing FW extend or eliminate the time in between army 1 and army 2? 

Does it end a players incentive to buy, say, 4 boxes of Thunderwolves or Bloodcrushers just so they can try something crazy at an event? (in favor of spending the extra 150 on something cool from FW) A bad example, but it happens.

Does the new, younger player save up for something awesome from FW instead of buying 2-3 more boxes of stuff, which represents 2-3 months worth of his spending?

Do people start buying FW models primarily because they're veteran gamers who have explored the hobby to the extent that they see fit?  Will these people buy FW models anyway?  Is BG worried about this?

How much do people actually consider their spending when new army books come along?  Do people think about and consider the investment or do they just do what they want?  If they do consider it, would they also consider investing X hundred dollars in the FW stuff they've been eyeing instead of the new army book now that they know they can use it in all / some / most of BG games and events?

How do people / players weight their "wants" and how does allowing FW factor in to that?  If a player skips out on the Chaos Demon release because he'd prefer to pick up 2-3 models for FW instead, that hurts quite a bit long term.  (And comes back to the delaying of a new army due to FW.  Same point really.)

These are just some of the easier points to communicate via text.



If we are assuming that the allowance of FW is primarily based on the impact it'll have on sales at both BG locations in the present and near future the discussion boils down to:

Are there more players that would be incentivised to buy GW models from BG by the allowance of FW than there would be players that use FW to supplement exsisting armies / ideas, therefore delaying or totally eliminating GW purchases into the future?

It is my belief that the allowance of FW in all /many events increases the "life" of an army a considerable amount.  Secondarily, it's likely to increase FW awareness and FW "culture" in and around the stores (Plainville, mainly).  I believe that both of these things are less than ideal for the business.  This is also to say nothing for the buying habits / trends in the long term (years), and how I believe the allowance of FW to adversely effect that.


It would be fantastic to be convinced that I am wrong and that these are not legitimate concerns.  Either way I think players can expect to see more BG events that do allow some or all FW models than we've ever done before.  I'm a lot less against FW now than I was 1 year ago.  Lots of what's going on here is dramatized for effect, although the points are probably not less valid.


I'm interested in how many events out there allow FW and are NOT put on by clubs.  I feel like every time I see an event that allows FW it is not put on buy a store (a for profit business).  I suspect there's a reason for that.

I suggested we tacked the monetary issue first because it seems more important. 

My opinion is that anything that gets or keeps people more "into" the game, is good for business.  Like magic, if there are kids who buy most of their cards on ebay, but make awesome decks that are hard to beat, doesn't that incentivize the rest to make better decks to take him down.  Wouldn't that increase BG sales?

I personally buy some models on ebay if they are particularly expensive/overcosted.  Or if I go to a solid event at another store from time to time, if I need something I will buy it there too.  But I spend most of my gaming money at BG. This percentage probably won't change.  I will always likely get 70-80% of my stuff from BG, what might change is the ebay/other store stuff.

I've already suggested that I would pay more for FW through the store.  Like slapping a 20$ on top of the order.  I mean, when you buy a unit of bloodcrushers, don't you make around that per box?

Here is the point, I am already paying more than I have to in order to support the store.  I do this because I want to, I do this because it is good for our local community, and for a store I like to stay in business and run events I want to play in.  Why do you think a large percentage of this wouldn't still do this just because the vendor changes to FW?  If the main barrier is simply because BG makes no money off them, then ban all models from vendors you don't carry.
You make money due to the customers in the community.   Case and point.  Troy recently wanted some mantic models.  He came to you to ask if you could get them for him.  He didn't have to do that.

BG has always done well because You and Derek have always been open and honest and fair with all of us, and we appreciate it greatly. 

I'll be open and honest with you.  I literally NEVER make impulse buys.  I know what I want typically for weeks before I purchase them.  I always have models in mind to purchase if I win/place in an event, and I will wait to see if I do(and then often buy it anyways if I don't place).  Everything is planned out and I have no incentive other than supporting you guys to ever buy anything at BG, but that is enough of a reason for me.

Also, many FW models still require base GW models to be purchased also as a base for the addons.

BrianP

  • Heroic Tier Level 1
  • **
  • Posts: 66
    • Email
Re: Forgeworld at BG tournaments?
« Reply #37 on: March 01, 2013, 01:09:47 PM »
If the only reason people want to use FW models in tournaments is that they like how they look and the "balance" they provide to their already existing army, and not that they are overpowered or provide a strategic edge ("surprise! Bet ya didn't know this even existed...") then I am fine with allowing painted FW models.

Tournaments are a time constrained environment that takes away player-choice in their opponent. Normally if I think someone has just jumped on a band-wagon and is trying to field a bunch of unpainted resin, or worse, GW-count-as-FW models I can just walk away and avoid the less-than-fun game that lies ahead.

When playing someone I know just wants to use a given FW model or two because they are cool we have plenty of time to review the rules for the models I'm unfamiliar with.

Both of those things are made much more difficult in a tournament environment, and while I definitely want to win, I ALSO want to have fun.

There already 15 armies with unique rules I am trying to learn and keep track off, adding FW just makes things even crazier. This does not even consider the fact that Chase/Sam or whoever ends up checking lists now has to have access to FW books and rules to sign off on them as both being approved, having no FAQ-updates, and accurately pointed... it is just a LOT of extra work that we, as players in an event, do not have to deal with.

At the end of the day, subtle things that only inconvenience people who are bandwagon-jumping seem an appropriate balance to allowing FW. If someone wants to use FW models fine, but the models should be painted and the player should have the appropriate rulebook (NOT a printout they stole from a pdf online) on hand to allow their opponent to familiarize themselves with the rules for their models.

MM3791

  • God
  • *****
  • Posts: 1124
Re: Forgeworld at BG tournaments?
« Reply #38 on: March 01, 2013, 01:14:40 PM »
How many Eldar Guardian boxes does GW sell? Probably not very many, they are the worst unit in all 40k game and have been for a long time. But now let's say you allow a FW Eldar Cosair list.. you would then probably sell A LOT of Eldar Guardian box sets.

The confusion is FW models vs FW rules, and many hardcore gamers(like myself) care more about good rules. With that ruleset you literally turn a bad selling GW model into a really popular one, not to mention additional weapon sprue purchases that the Corsairs require. The Corsairs are literally Guardians with better weapons/upgrades... same model. This is one of many examples, but a good one.

BG makes money if someone A) Starts a new army, or B) Expands on an existing army. A lot of people have no disire to start a new army, but also refuse to expand on an army with out of date rules. It doesn't matter if $200 is spent on new Daemons models or 8 year old Guardians, its still a business transaction just different preferance for the customer.

Even if BG banned FW models, but allowed FW rules it would not only have almost no negative financial impact on BG, it may even sell out their older models. I'm not advocating either way as Chase has some  good points too, but I feel more specific examples are required so non players can gain better perspective.
« Last Edit: March 01, 2013, 03:13:15 PM by MM3791 »

Ian Mulligan

  • God
  • *****
  • Posts: 1730
  • Egotistical Powergamer
    • Mutants and Shit
    • Email
Re: Forgeworld at BG tournaments?
« Reply #39 on: March 01, 2013, 02:20:45 PM »
Everyone I know who has a large collection of Forgeworld makes regular purchases at BG. They have for years.

Everyone I know who buys primarily online or trades for things has little to no Forgeworld.

This is pretty anecdotal, so I'm not drawing any conclusions. It is pretty interesting, though.
beep bop boop

keithb

  • Epic Tier Level 24
  • ****
  • Posts: 811
Re: Forgeworld at BG tournaments?
« Reply #40 on: March 01, 2013, 03:07:55 PM »
If the only reason people want to use FW models in tournaments is that they like how they look and the "balance" they provide to their already existing army, and not that they are overpowered or provide a strategic edge ("surprise! Bet ya didn't know this even existed...") then I am fine with allowing painted FW models.

No other models are required to be painted, so why the double standard?

Tournaments are a time constrained environment that takes away player-choice in their opponent. Normally if I think someone has just jumped on a band-wagon and is trying to field a bunch of unpainted resin, or worse, GW-count-as-FW models I can just walk away and avoid the less-than-fun game that lies ahead.

When playing someone I know just wants to use a given FW model or two because they are cool we have plenty of time to review the rules for the models I'm unfamiliar with.

No one is saying use GW as FW, so stop pretending that would be allowed.  It is generally a good idea to go over obscure stuff about your codex with your opponent anyways, unless you know they know it already.  I always explain how the Doom of Malan'ti works to my opponents.  I don't see doing it for 2 models is that crazy.

Both of those things are made much more difficult in a tournament environment, and while I definitely want to win, I ALSO want to have fun.
You always get 15 minutes during set up.  You are allowed to talk about army lists during this time.  You are free to trash your opponents paint score in the sheet provided.  But since BG requires NO models to be painted, holding FW to a different standard because it offends you to see resin unpainted as opposed to plastics or metals is silly and childish.

There already 15 armies with unique rules I am trying to learn and keep track off, adding FW just makes things even crazier. This does not even consider the fact that Chase/Sam or whoever ends up checking lists now has to have access to FW books and rules to sign off on them as both being approved, having no FAQ-updates, and accurately pointed... it is just a LOT of extra work that we, as players in an event, do not have to deal with.
You have 15 minutes of set up time to talk about it, and a 2 hour game.  Also there is a lunch break and a break between the 2nd and 3rd rounds if you are concerned about playing models you don't know or understand.  Typically it is ALWAYS required for people playing FW at events to have the rules present.


At the end of the day, subtle things that only inconvenience people who are bandwagon-jumping seem an appropriate balance to allowing FW. If someone wants to use FW models fine, but the models should be painted and the player should have the appropriate rulebook (NOT a printout they stole from a pdf online) on hand to allow their opponent to familiarize themselves with the rules for their models.

Of course they should have the rule book and the actual model.  No one is arguing against this.  Why should anti-bandwagon be limited to FW?  Any new army book or book that benefits from a recent FAQ change should have to be fully painted forces to participate in any event you go to.... in your basement.

Grand Master Steve

  • Guest
Re: Forgeworld at BG tournaments?
« Reply #41 on: March 01, 2013, 03:43:07 PM »
I am just going to troll this a bit and see where the discussion goes. My opinion is I want to use FW stuff since I just got the stuff for the Minotaur chapter which is just a pair of special characters that make a generic marine army into Minotaurs. Do I have to use em? no would be nice though. if i cant use those characters I can simply use regular marine captain and chaplain as a substitute. The only real ground breaking thing they give me is Hatred for Marines which is rather sick. Other than that nothing special. As I said im just going to troll this one and read others thoughts cause im curious. :)

King of the Elves

  • Guest
Re: Forgeworld at BG tournaments?
« Reply #42 on: March 01, 2013, 03:59:33 PM »
Will anyone flat-out refuse to play without FW?

 I believe the term is "rage quit"

 But really, I will probably play in most Abington events, just convenience. But if (for example) Plainville tourneys started allowing FW, I would be more inclined to make it down there. This has nothing to do with the stores (other than distance) but I feel that FW was allowed more, more people would show up. Just my opinion. 
« Last Edit: March 01, 2013, 04:05:42 PM by King of the Elves »

Chase

  • Global Moderator
  • God
  • *****
  • Posts: 5433
    • Email
Re: Forgeworld at BG tournaments?
« Reply #43 on: March 01, 2013, 04:12:20 PM »
Keith's suggestions to charge a small premium on tournament fees and/or the models themselves is an interesting suggestion, part of which I've considered.  I wanted to avoid getting into that sort of discussion on the boards, which is why I didn't address it.  Both of them would require a small talk.

My opinion is that anything that gets or keeps people more "into" the game, is good for business. 

That's simply a fact and should not be ignored in this discussion.


Everyone I know who has a large collection of Forgeworld makes regular purchases at BG. They have for years.

Everyone I know who buys primarily online or trades for things has little to no Forgeworld.

This is pretty anecdotal, so I'm not drawing any conclusions. It is pretty interesting, though.

This is an interesting observation.




The amount of extra work that is involved with allowing FW stuff in our events should be ignored for purposes of this discussion.  It's literally our job to execute whatever event we put together.  List checking is handled by Sam.  He doesn't seem to sweat it.  Besides, working him harder than normal for a couple days a month is okay.
« Last Edit: March 01, 2013, 04:19:18 PM by Chase »
"In the absence of orders, go find something and kill it."
- Field Marshal Erwin Rommel

Grimwulfe

  • God
  • *****
  • Posts: 1154
  • Dark Star Founding Member
    • Email
Re: Forgeworld at BG tournaments?
« Reply #44 on: March 01, 2013, 04:23:17 PM »
If you allow FW then you would need to allow ALL 40k approved FW.  Not just from 2 books.  Has this been discussed?
Dark Star Founding Member
NOVA 2011 Trios Team Champions
NOVA 2012 Trios Team Champions
WGC 2013 Doubles Best Sportman
NOVA 2013 Trios Team Champions
DaBoyz GT 2013 Best Theme 1st Place
Adepticon Champ 2014 Best Imperial Showing
Adepticon Team 2014 Best Imperial Showing