Oh, I don't mind being called out. I like to know when I've done something untoward. Like most people, I sometimes do things I oughtn't without realizing it, and rather someone told me than didn't. As for doing it publicly, perhaps others can learn from my mistakes.
Keith, I know more people that have gone to GTs in the past year specifically to get a ticket to the Nova Invitational (and also to the ToS, but not to the same degree) than have gone to win the prize support. With the possible exception of the Boston Brawl this year, I'm unaware of any GT where the prize support is a major draw. On the flip side, surely the first place prize in the second round isn't the primary reason people play HB. If it were, no one would ever play in the finals. I'm just guessing, but I think the prime motivator for playing in HB is the same as in GTs, and that the motivation is that people enjoy playing a bunch of 40k in a day against people they don't normally play.
But I don't exactly have my finger on the pulse of the 40k community. Suppose you're right and that my analogy was deeply flawed. Still, I'm confused about your position. And I'd like to get clear on it so that I can better determine whether it is a sound one. Although, to be honest, I'm inclined to act in accordance with it on the assumption that upsetting people is worse than not. Is one of the following your position? And if not, what is your position?
1. If there is a competition that you cannot win, you ought not enter the competition because by doing so, you may skew the results.
2. If there is a competition the prize of which you cannot claim, you ought not enter the competition because by doing so, you may skew the results.
I'm genuinely curious, and not trying to put words in your mouth by suggesting either of the above. Just trying to get clear about your objection to my actions.
As to how good I am, you know as well as I do that winning a 10 person event with weird rules and an abnormal point level is a poor indicator of skill.