Author Topic: Australia's decision on Necron  (Read 1102 times)

andalucien

  • God
  • *****
  • Posts: 1180
Re: Australia's decision on Necron
« Reply #15 on: December 30, 2012, 09:15:01 PM »
Haha... interesting point Mannahnin...  I feel like we are all theologians from the middle ages, trying to decipher obscure parables...
Name:  Matthew Forsyth
Club:  Errybody in the gettin tips
Where I play: basically I only show up for tourneys or when I'm on my way up to New Hampshire to visit my folks.  I live about 45 mins from both stores, to the south.

Benjamin

  • God
  • *****
  • Posts: 2610
    • Email
Re: Australia's decision on Necron
« Reply #16 on: December 30, 2012, 10:43:18 PM »
Is that before or after the Necrons befriend the Blood Angels?

Oh fluff, you say the craziest things.

Mannahnin

  • Heroic Tier Level 2
  • **
  • Posts: 83
    • Email
Re: Australia's decision on Necron
« Reply #17 on: December 31, 2012, 07:35:07 PM »
I found it interesting; it's a great illustration that fluff can be found to justify most anything.  if I were to GUESS, I suspect GW will/would FAQ it to say they don't take the hits, but honestly I think taking the hits is certainly justifiable in the rules.  As long as we have a ruling, though, I'm comfortable either way.

Banosby

  • Heroic Tier Level 3
  • **
  • Posts: 136
Re: Australia's decision on Necron
« Reply #18 on: December 31, 2012, 07:57:41 PM »
For what it is worth, I'm entirely in agreement with Mannahnin's sentiments.